Three Important Questions to Ask at a Civil RICO Deposition

You have filed your civil RICO case on behalf of the plaintiff and have made it past the Rule 12(b) motions and are in discovery.  What should be the focus of your questions in depositions of relevant persons and parties?

  1. First, you would want to ask questions which would prove the existence of a RICO “enterprise.”  RICO’s definition of enterprise broadly encompasses many types of organizations, ranging from hierarchal groups to loosely associated groups of individuals and corporations who act with a common purpose and function as a continuing unit.  The typical proof of an enterprise would come from an examination of what the group does, which would be the focus of your questions.  Also, you would want to make sure that the RICO enterprise is “distinct” from the RICO defendant, that is, they are not the same.  A legal entity by definition is a RICO enterprise but you would want to be sure the RICO defendant is not this same legal entity. Proof of such an entity is usually straightforward based on documents.
  2. Second, you would want to ask questions to prove there is “racketeering activity.” Racketeering activity includes specifically enumerated federal crimes and certain state offenses. The federal offenses alleged in a civil RICO typically involve mail and mail and wire fraud. You would need to ask questions which would prove all of the elements of mail fraud and wire fraud. State offenses include bribery offenses, which commonly serve as predicate crimes for racketeering indictments against state and local officials for corruption.
  3. Third, you would need to solicit information as whether there is a “pattern of racketeering activity.”  To prove PORA, the plaintiff must show that the activity is both “related” and “continuous.”  Generally, the “relationship” prong is more easily proven, while the “continuity” prong may be proven in several ways, either by length of time of the predicates or  whether the predicates pose a “threat of continuing activity.”

There are many other issues involved in a complex civil RICO case, such as proving monetary injury proximately and directly caused by the “racketeering activity.”  Civil RICO cases are difficult to litigate through trial and generally difficult to get favorable rulings. However, the many advantages of a civil RICO case, such as broad venue, evidentiary advantages, potential treble damages and civil RICO litigation attorneys’ fees, provide support for bringing your fraud action in federal court.

This article is courtesy of David J. Stander, principal at the Law Office of David J. Stander LLC.  Mr. Stander focuses his practice on civil RICO litigation and consulting.

Why You Should Invest In A Quality Court Reporting Company

Court Reporting Company DC | Why A Cheap One Will Lose You a Case

Why would you hire a court reporting company in Washington, DC? If you find yourself involved in litigation, having a skilled court reporter, a capable videographer, and thorough case management services are only a few reasons. If you decide to hire a quality court reporting company, the DC litigation experience is much less likely to be a source of stress. However, if you employ a cheap or under-experienced court reporting agency, DC legal system will make you anxious and tense.

Court Reporting Company DC | Why You Should Invest

It’s simply not worth saving a few bucks by investing in a novice court reporting company in Washington DC. The best agencies in our nation’s capital exhibit most if not all of these characteristics together with offering national and international court reporting services:

  • Approved to engage with government clients
  • Have experience in a wide array of litigation experience
  • Provide court reporters, videographers, and interpreters
  • Incorporate technology to streamline your legal process
  • Submit accurate legal transcripts
  • State-of-the-art videoconferencing systems

Yes, it’s true – these features of a quality court reporting company will still come at a reasonable price. However, it’s very likely that a cheaper or less-experienced court reporting agency won’t provide even half of the above services.

A court reporting company without a range of litigation experience might not have seen your exact type of court case. This may lead to oversights and a lost case.

A court reporting agency that doesn’t incorporate technology will slow down your legal process, an already naturally slow development. This may lead to even more legal fees, not to mention your valuable time.

A court reporting company that doesn’t offer it’s services nationally may not be able to provide you litigation support at the location of your trial. This means the legal backing you’re paying for won’t be of any help when you’re in the courtroom.

Investing in a cheap, inexperienced court reporting company in Washington DC will cause more legal frustration than you think.